Comprehensive Assessment Tracking System

Memory vs. Reasoning

Monday, August 13, 2012 to Friday, December 14, 2012
Abstract: 

Our goal was to raise the grade of muscle lab practicals. A muscle practical requires recognizing/naming 60 muscles, and stating  the action of those muscles. I hypothesized it should be easier for students to learn three rules and 8 joint movements, and reason out the muscle actions,  than it would be to memorize 60 names.  Students recieved a list of the name, origin, insertion, action of 60 muscles  a website showing muscle clay images,  flashcards,  and animations.  They built muscles in clay and discussed them with partners. Integration of new technques in S2013 including mandatory modeling of movements and outloud repetition of names resulted in improvement in student scores in identificatin of muscles and their actions. In an effort to improve student reasoning skills, all parts of their grade improved. 

Division/Department: 
Completed Full Cycle: 
Yes
Course Number: 
BIO201
AttachmentSize
File tiny-tim-muscle-cats.docx145.26 KB

Comments

JAMBS11261's picture
up
0 users have voted.

Sandy. Your idea is very hands on and interactive. Building the muscles and discussing them with each other is a form of roll playing. I think building the muscle is a great way to help them actually remember it long term. Sometimes with memorization they will forget as soon as the test is over. It will be interesting to see the results.

SONWK80641's picture
up
0 users have voted.

You know, I think I will try a small pop quiz (maybe just one muscle!) about the previous week's muscles to see if they can reason out the action even if they forget the name.  Good idea to test.

MARSL33291's picture
up
0 users have voted.

I thought this was a neat idea when I first saw it, Sandy. I'm wondering if you're still using it, and if you've managed to collect more data on student performance on the practical.

BROAA00004's picture
up
0 users have voted.

Sandy, did you add data from Spring13?