Comprehensive Assessment Tracking System

ENG101 Common Assignment Assessment -- 2012/2013

Contributors: 
ANA2034755's picture
Anastasia Amabisca
KATMO78501's picture
Kathleen Iudicello
KELVJ57351's picture
Kelly Loucy
SUSAA00007's picture
Susan Malmo
ANAAA00003's picture
Analicia Buentello
Rating: 
5
Average: 5 (4 votes)
Monday, August 20, 2012 to Monday, January 7, 2013
Abstract: 

In order to compare the performance of those students who had placed directly into ENG101 (placers) with students who had completed ENG091 in order to get into ENG101 (completers), we completed an ENG101 common assignment and assessed an equal number of each group.  We used most of the EMCC Writing Rubric (Focus, Support, Organization, Language Use, and Mechanics--scale of 1 - 4.)  All nine residential ENG faculty took part in the assessment on January 7, 2013 -- we particiapted in norming and then scored papers.  Four faculty read each paper, and the four scores were averaged.  We found that the placers out-performed the completers in every category, with tthe smallest difference being in the Mechanics category; all other categories were quite similar.

Ave. of All Papers/Ave. of Placers/Ave. of Completers

Focus: 2.58/2.77/2.39 (.38)

Support: 2.26/2.47/2.06 (.41)

Organization: 2.45/2.67/2.23 (.44)

Lang. Use: 2.46/2.64/2.27 (.38)

Mechanics: 2.48/2.62/2.35  (.27)

We plan to use this information to inform our efforts to improve ENG081/091.

Division/Department: 
Completed Full Cycle: 
No
Course Number: 
ENG 101
ENG 091
Assessment of the Month: 
February, 2013

Comments

terkt14831's picture
up
0 users have voted.

Results and participation are impressive!

ERIQF52091's picture
up
0 users have voted.

This is a great example of including multiple faculty to complete a meaningful project.  I will be interested to see what reactions the division takes as a result of these findings.

SUSAA00007's picture
up
0 users have voted.

We have our "Closing the Loop Plans" attached now.

MARSL33291's picture
up
0 users have voted.

I like your closing the loop plans to both re-assess another group of ENG101 students as well as a pre and post common assignment in ENG091 and 101 to see where “placers” are improving or failing to improve.  I think it's important to do both, since the first will give you more data points and the second may give you some idea of what changes you can make to curriculum or instruction.

I'm wondering if we could extend your strategy to MAT091 and MAT121.

SUSAA00007's picture
up
0 users have voted.

That was what we were hoping when Annie and I developed the plan for our MSI project: that it could be used by other areas.  Let me know if you want any help or need to know anything!